HARDWARE BENCHMARK & VRAM ENVELOPE โ€ข MULTI-GPU RIG48 GB VRAM โ€ข 936 GB/s

What Models Can Run on 2x NVIDIA RTX 3090 Dual Rig (48GB Total VRAM)?

48 GB VRAM936 GB/s Bandwidth700W TDPMSRP: $1,550Cloud: $0.78/hr on Vast.ai

2x NVIDIA RTX 3090 Dual Rig (48GB Total VRAM) provides 48 GB of usable memory with 936 GB/s memory bandwidth at 700W TDP. Best price-to-VRAM homelab rig for 70B Q4_K_M & Qwen 3.8 27B Q8.

โœ… Runs 100% in GPU VRAM (Optimal Headroom)21.93 GB (46%)~34 t/s

Model & Target Hardware

interactive
Agentic Coding, Terminal Workflows & Multi-File Refactoring
Qwen 3.8 27B Instruct on 2x NVIDIA RTX 3090 Dual Rig (48GB Total VRAM)

โœ“ Fits Comfortably in VRAM

โœ“ FITS IN VRAM
Required VRAM
21.93 GB
46% of hardware capacity (48 GB)
Est. Decode Speed
~34 tok/s
Dense model @ 936 GB/s
Available Headroom
+26.07 GB
Safe for OS display & full context
Memory Allocation & Headroom
21.93 GB allocated of 48 GB capacity
46% utilized
Weights: 16.32 GB
KV: (32K): 4.29 GB
Overhead: 1.32 GB
Free Headroom: +26.07 GB
โšก Architecture & Throughput Transparency: Single-user decode speed (~34 tok/s) is memory-bandwidth bound at batch size = 1 on 2x NVIDIA RTX 3090 Dual Rig (48GB Total VRAM) (936 GB/s). Prompt prefill / TTFT (~493 tok/s) is compute-bound and utilizes GPU Tensor cores. Actual latency varies with FlashAttention-2 and runtime engine (Ollama/vLLM/llama.cpp).
OLLAMA_FLASH_ATTENTION=1 OLLAMA_KV_CACHE_TYPE=q8_0 ollama run qwen3.8:27b

Quantization Precision Matrix

32K ctx โ€ข KV: Q8_0
QuantizationWeightsKV CacheTotal VRAMEst. SpeedFit Status
FP1616 bpw54.4 GB4.29 GB61.34 GB (128%)~2 t/sPARTIAL
Q8_08.5 bpw28.83 GB4.29 GB34.88 GB (73%)~19 t/sFITS
Q6_K6.56 bpw22.3 GB4.29 GB28.12 GB (59%)~25 t/sFITS
Q5_K_M5.68 bpw19.31 GB4.29 GB25.03 GB (52%)~29 t/sFITS
Q4_K_M4.8 bpw16.32 GB4.29 GB21.93 GB (46%)~34 t/sFITS
FP44.25 bpw14.42 GB4.29 GB19.96 GB (42%)~38 t/sFITS
IQ3_XS3.3 bpw11.15 GB4.29 GB16.58 GB (35%)~48 t/sFITS

Export Full Architecture & Infrastructure Spec

Get an executive-ready PDF report with exact memory math, hardware benchmarks, and cost comparisons.

All Open-Weights Models Tested on 2x NVIDIA RTX 3090 Dual Rig (48GB Total VRAM) (Q4_K_M @ 32K Context)

Standard Q4_K_M precision with 32K context window and Q8_0 KV cache

12 Models Benchmarked
ModelArchitectureTotal VRAM NeededHeadroomEst. Decode SpeedCompatibilityDetailed Config
Qwen 3.8 27B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud
27.2B Dense21.93 GB(46%)+26.07 GB~34 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B MoE
Alibaba Cloud
35B MoE24.1 GB(50%)+23.9 GB~263 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (552B Engram MoE)
DeepSeek
552B MoE345.59 GB(720%)-297.59 GB0 (OOM)โœ• OOMConfigure CLI โ†’
Meta Muse Spark Open (816B-A42B MoE)
Meta AI
816B MoE512.86 GB(1068%)-464.86 GB0 (OOM)โœ• OOMConfigure CLI โ†’
Google Gemma 4 26B MoE
Google
26.4B MoE20.23 GB(42%)+27.77 GB~176 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
Google Gemma 4 E4B (Edge 4B)
Google
4.1B Dense4.24 GB(9%)+43.76 GB~215 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
32.8B Dense25.41 GB(53%)+22.59 GB~28 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
14.8B Dense13.16 GB(27%)+34.84 GB~60 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
Meta Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B MoE)
Meta AI
109B MoE71.66 GB(149%)-23.66 GB0 (OOM)โœ• OOMConfigure CLI โ†’
Meta Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta AI
70.6B Dense49.96 GB(104%)-1.96 GB~3 tok/sโšก PARTIALConfigure CLI โ†’
Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta AI
8B Dense7.87 GB(16%)+40.13 GB~109 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’
Microsoft Phi-4 Mini 3.8B
Microsoft
3.8B Dense3.92 GB(8%)+44.08 GB~234 tok/sโœ“ FITSConfigure CLI โ†’